A new FBI report proves that the Justice Department is failing to combat internet fraud. Here’s how the government should address that.
Last week, the Federal Bureau of Investigation released its annual report on internet crime, and the numbers on internet fraud were both predictable and disturbing.
It was another record year. The bureau received 791,790 complaints of “internet-enabled crime” in 2020 (a 69 percent increase over the prior year), representing over $4.1 billion in reported losses (a 20 percent increase). These complaints included a wide array of crimes, such as phishing, spoofing, extortion, data breaches, and identity theft. Collectively, they represent further evidence of the Justice Department’s long-running failure to effectively pursue internet fraud.
Since the start of the pandemic, the scope and frequency of this criminal activity has become noticeably worse. Online fraudsters have stolen government relief checks, sold fake test kits and vaccines, and exploited the altruistic impulses of the American public through fake charities. But the broader failure has wreaked incalculable harm on the American public for years, including those in our most vulnerable and less tech-savvy populations, like senior citizens. The FBI’s most recent report makes it clear that the government needs to dramatically step up and rethink its approach to combating internet-based fraud—including how it tracks this problem, as well as how it can punish and deter these crimes more effectively going forward.
For two decades, the FBI’s numbers on internet crime have been steadily rising. What’s more, these figures probably understate the actual amount by many orders of magnitude. There are two reasons for this: First, the government does not conduct surveys to gather data on the prevalence of financial fraud as it does for other crimes. And second, fraud in general is a notoriously under-reported crime, as many people are embarrassed to report that they’ve been fooled.
I know these problems well. While I worked at the Department of Justice, I led the prosecution of a massive internet-based fraud run from Israel that victimized people across the globe by fraudulently marketing financial instruments known as “binary options.” Tens of thousands of people lost about $145 million altogether. It was not easy, but in 2019, thanks in large part to the work of two dedicated FBI agents over two and a half years (and a bit of luck), we were able to convict Lee Elbaz, the CEO of the company, along with lower-level participants. Unfortunately, these outcomes are far too infrequent.
One major reason that internet fraud remains such a persistent and vexing problem is that the Justice Department has never made it a real priority—in part because these kinds of cases are not particularly attractive to prosecutors. Victim losses on an individual basis tend to be relatively small and widely dispersed. A substantial amount of this crime also originates abroad, and it can be hard and bureaucratically cumbersome to obtain evidence from foreign governments—particularly from countries where these scams comprise a large, de facto industry that employs many people. It is also far more challenging to find and secure cooperating insider witnesses when the perpetrators are beyond our borders. And even under the best of circumstances, the large body of documentary evidence that fraud cases involve can be exceedingly difficult to gather and review. If you manage to overcome all of those obstacles, you may still end up having to deal with years of extradition-related litigation before anyone ever sees the inside of a courtroom. Making matters worse, much of the press does not treat these cases as particularly newsworthy—itself a symptom of how routine internet fraud has become—and prosecutors like being in the press.
The situation worsened under the Trump administration. According to Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, the number of “white-collar crime” prosecutions—including for internet fraud—repeatedly fell to all-time lows in those four years. And like much of the federal government under Trump, the Justice Department’s criminal anti-fraud enforcement efforts became even less effective, as unqualified and sometimes incompetent officials took over and mismanaged them.
So far, the widespread problems posed by criminal internet fraud haven’t publicly attracted the attention of the Biden-Garland Justice Department, but it is vital that they do. The direct harms of internet fraud are bad enough on their own, but over the last year, we have also seen how they can lead to much larger and even costlier problems. Since the start of the pandemic, state governments have been inundated by fraudulent unemployment benefit claims that can be traced to foreign criminals using previously stolen personal identifying information—creating a financial mess for victims who are just now learning that their identities were stolen, and costing the affected states many billions of dollars to date.
There are no easy solutions to any of this, but the problem will only continue to worsen unless the federal government makes a concerted effort to address it. To start, this will require measuring the problem in a more systematic way—not simply by relying on self-reports by victims, but conducting surveys to estimate the prevalence of fraud and other financial crime in the country.
The Justice Department should also make this a real enforcement priority. That would mean directing US Attorneys’ Offices throughout the country to commit more time and energy to these cases. The department would be wise to consider a centralized, nationwide unit that could handle these types of cases. This would help address the collective-action problem that law enforcement currently faces, since losses to mass internet fraud in particular are widely dispersed across the country. Congress must do its part by substantially increasing funding for the department’s work in this area.
The Justice Department should also improve its coordination with consumer-oriented regulatory agencies, which “refer” some of their cases to the Justice Department when they believe criminal laws may have been violated. A lot of the most vital consumer protection work is done by the Federal Trade Commission and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the government needs to ensure that the Justice Department is criminally prosecuting the conduct uncovered by those agencies when appropriate.
Another critical piece of the puzzle is improving international law enforcement coordination. The fight against internet fraud is a global one, and we cannot make serious headway without other governments providing us with evidence and extraditing their citizens in a timely manner. One way to see some improvement in the area might be through a system of law enforcement grants—contingent on demonstrable improvements in this area—to countries where this is a particular problem.
This is just one of the many challenges at the Justice Department that the new administration has inherited, and some patience is in order. But time is not on our side. This is a problem that will continue to metastasize—including in new and unpredictable ways—unless and until the federal government dramatically steps up its enforcement efforts.
All Rights Reserved for Ankush Khardori